Otteri Police Station vs Parthasarathy — 213/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th May 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG060065552023

Case disposed

Filing Number

6527/2023

Filing Date

27-06-2023

Registration No

213/2023

Registration Date

27-06-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

Decision Date

20th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

4245

Police Station

OTTERI

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 279,304(A)

Petitioner(s)

Otteri Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Parthasarathy

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

20-05-2026

Disposed

15-05-2026

Judgement

12-05-2026

Arguments

28-04-2026

Questioning

02-04-2026

Questioning

Final Orders / Judgements

20-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case 213/2023 Summary: Parthasarathy was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a 2020 road accident where a two-wheeler rider died after collisions with a car and TATA van. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient, noting that key eyewitnesses failed to identify the accused, describe the alleged vehicle, or establish rash/negligent driving, while witness testimony lacked critical details about the accident location and circumstances. Given the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the offence, the court granted acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

26-09-2024
Oral Evidence
12-11-2024
Oral Evidence
11-03-2026
Oral Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Case 213/2023 Summary: Parthasarathy was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a 2020 road accident where a two-wheeler rider died after collisions with a car and TATA van. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient, noting that key eyewitnesses failed to identify the accused, describe the alleged vehicle, or establish rash/negligent driving, while witness testimony lacked critical details about the accident location and circumstances. Given the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the offence, the court granted acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case