Otteri Police Station vs Parthasarathy — 213/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG060065552023
Filing Number
6527/2023
Filing Date
27-Jun-2023
Registration No
213/2023
Registration Date
27-Jun-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
4245
Police Station
OTTERI
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Otteri Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Parthasarathy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 213/2023 Summary: Parthasarathy was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a 2020 road accident where a two-wheeler rider died after collisions with a car and TATA van. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient, noting that key eyewitnesses failed to identify the accused, describe the alleged vehicle, or establish rash/negligent driving, while witness testimony lacked critical details about the accident location and circumstances. Given the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the offence, the court granted acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
15-May-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
12-May-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
28-Apr-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
02-Apr-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
16-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
11-Mar-2026
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
29-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
19-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
12-Nov-2024
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
26-Sep-2024
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
03-Sep-2024
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
16-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
27-May-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
29-Apr-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
14-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
27-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
11-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
28-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
27-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 213/2023
Case 213/2023 Summary: Parthasarathy was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a 2020 road accident where a two-wheeler rider died after collisions with a car and TATA van. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient, noting that key eyewitnesses failed to identify the accused, describe the alleged vehicle, or establish rash/negligent driving, while witness testimony lacked critical details about the accident location and circumstances. Given the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the offence, the court granted acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts