Otteri Police Station vs Parthasarathy — 213/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG060065552023
Filing Number
6527/2023
Filing Date
27-06-2023
Registration No
213/2023
Registration Date
27-06-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
4245
Police Station
OTTERI
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Otteri Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Parthasarathy
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 02-04-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 213/2023 Summary: Parthasarathy was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a 2020 road accident where a two-wheeler rider died after collisions with a car and TATA van. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient, noting that key eyewitnesses failed to identify the accused, describe the alleged vehicle, or establish rash/negligent driving, while witness testimony lacked critical details about the accident location and circumstances. Given the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the offence, the court granted acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 213/2023 Summary: Parthasarathy was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a 2020 road accident where a two-wheeler rider died after collisions with a car and TATA van. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient, noting that key eyewitnesses failed to identify the accused, describe the alleged vehicle, or establish rash/negligent driving, while witness testimony lacked critical details about the accident location and circumstances. Given the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the offence, the court granted acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts