INSPECTOR OF POLICE MA vs Anandhan Alias Anandkumar — 444/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG060061452024

Filing Number

6010/2024

Filing Date

22-Oct-2024

Registration No

444/2024

Registration Date

22-Oct-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

363

Police Station

MARAIMALAINAGAR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE MA

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anandhan Alias Anandkumar

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  10. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  12. 19-Sep-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 444/2024 Witness Madhanraj (age 39) deposited testimony before Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu on 19.09.2025 regarding an incident on 08.08.2023. The witness testified about observing a road accident and subsequently identifying a fingerprint (marked as M2) that he claimed was his own. During cross-examination, the witness stated he had no prior knowledge of the incident location, that the accused were not his relatives, and clarified the circumstances of his fingerprint identification. The deposition was recorded in Tamil, read over to the witness in court presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  15. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  16. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  17. 21-Jul-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  18. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  19. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  20. 25-Jun-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  21. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  22. 29-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  23. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  24. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  25. 18-Nov-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  26. 04-Nov-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  27. 22-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 22-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 444/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 444/2024 Witness Madhanraj (age 39) deposited testimony before Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu on 19.09.2025 regarding an incident on 08.08.2023. The witness testified about observing a road accident and subsequently identifying a fingerprint (marked as M2) that he claimed was his own. During cross-examination, the witness stated he had no prior knowledge of the incident location, that the accused were not his relatives, and clarified the circumstances of his fingerprint identification. The deposition was recorded in Tamil, read over to the witness in court presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case