Maraimalai Nagar Police Station vs xxxx — 45/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),296(b),351(2). Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 20th April 2026.

RCS - Referred Charge Sheet

CNR: TNCG060051402025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-07-2025

Filing Number

5109/2025

Filing Date

21-08-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

21-08-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

630

Police Station

MARAIMALAINAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),296(b),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

Maraimalai Nagar Police Station

Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE MARAIMALAINAGAR CRIME

Respondent(s)

xxxx

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

20-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Enquiry

18-03-2026

Enquiry

16-03-2026

Enquiry

24-02-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Copy of Order

Case 45/2025 Summary The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the protest petition filed by Rani against a "Mistake of Fact" closure report in a case involving alleged assault and jewelry disputes with pawnshop operator Mangalram. The court found no credible evidence of the alleged attack—witnesses stated they saw nothing—and noted Rani produced no receipts proving loan repayment or jewel redemption, characterizing the complaint as exaggerated with imaginary incidents. The court accepted the investigation officer's closure report and determined the underlying dispute over jewelry transactions was a civil matter requiring a proper civil forum, not criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 45/2025 Summary The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the protest petition filed by Rani against a "Mistake of Fact" closure report in a case involving alleged assault and jewelry disputes with pawnshop operator Mangalram. The court found no credible evidence of the alleged attack—witnesses stated they saw nothing—and noted Rani produced no receipts proving loan repayment or jewel redemption, characterizing the complaint as exaggerated with imaginary incidents. The court accepted the investigation officer's closure report and determined the underlying dispute over jewelry transactions was a civil matter requiring a proper civil forum, not criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case