R Harikrishnan vs T Pelavendran — 803/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCG060044332025
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
11-06-2025
Filing Number
4403/2025
Filing Date
22-07-2025
Registration No
803/2025
Registration Date
25-07-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R Harikrishnan
Adv. Prabhakar Ramamoorthy
Respondent(s)
T Pelavendran
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: S.T.C. No. 803/2025 Witness deposition recorded in Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Chengalpattu on 12.01.2026. Pw1 Hari Krishnan (age 56, from Vandalur) was sworn and examined under Chapter XXIII of the CrPC. Six documentary exhibits were marked and admitted: Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank receipt (20.02.2025), plaintiff notice (04.04.2025), case notification (28.04.2025), acknowledgement card (29.04.2025), reply notice (10.05.2025), and rejoinder notice. The deposition was typewritten and read over to the witness in Tamil, who admitted it as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.T.C. No. 803/2025 Witness deposition recorded in Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Chengalpattu on 12.01.2026. Pw1 Hari Krishnan (age 56, from Vandalur) was sworn and examined under Chapter XXIII of the CrPC. Six documentary exhibits were marked and admitted: Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank receipt (20.02.2025), plaintiff notice (04.04.2025), case notification (28.04.2025), acknowledgement card (29.04.2025), reply notice (10.05.2025), and rejoinder notice. The deposition was typewritten and read over to the witness in Tamil, who admitted it as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts