Jagadeeswari G vs Sundar V — 114/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 24th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG060035072023
Filing Number
3493/2023
Filing Date
06-04-2023
Registration No
114/2023
Registration Date
16-05-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jagadeeswari G
Adv. Magesh Kumar.H.T
Respondent(s)
Sundar V
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu
Disposed
Judgement
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 07-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 30-03-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 114/2023 (Jagadeeswari G v. Sundar V) The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹3,00,000. The complainant had lent ₹8,00,000 to the accused, who issued the cheque on 21.02.2023, but it was returned due to insufficient funds. After the complainant served statutory notice, the accused failed to pay, leading to this prosecution. The accused's defense that the cheque was stolen in 2017 by the complainant's husband was rejected as insufficiently proven, lacking corroborating evidence or witness testimony. The court sentenced the accused to four months simple imprisonment and ordered payment of the cheque amount as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 114/2023 (Jagadeeswari G v. Sundar V) The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹3,00,000. The complainant had lent ₹8,00,000 to the accused, who issued the cheque on 21.02.2023, but it was returned due to insufficient funds. After the complainant served statutory notice, the accused failed to pay, leading to this prosecution. The accused's defense that the cheque was stolen in 2017 by the complainant's husband was rejected as insufficiently proven, lacking corroborating evidence or witness testimony. The court sentenced the accused to four months simple imprisonment and ordered payment of the cheque amount as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts