Chengalpattu taluk police vs Boobalan Poomalai — 270/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG060026062024

Evidence

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-06-2024

Filing Number

2571/2024

Filing Date

07-06-2024

Registration No

270/2024

Registration Date

07-06-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

CHENGALPATTU TALUK

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 379

Petitioner(s)

Chengalpattu taluk police

Adv. Inspector Of Police Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station

Respondent(s)

Boobalan Poomalai

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

09-06-2026

Evidence

26-05-2026

Evidence

20-05-2026

Evidence

14-05-2026

Evidence

06-05-2026

Copies

Interim Orders

20-05-2026
Oral Evidence
26-05-2026
Oral Evidence

This document is a witness deposition record, not a case order. It records the testimony of witness Sathashivam (age 62) in Criminal Case 270/2024 before Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu on 26.05.2026. The witness testified regarding theft allegations and police investigation involving an accused named Boobalan, and confirmed his signatures on related documents (Ext. A2, A3, A4). During cross-examination, the witness stated he could not recall details about the accused's identification and denied giving false testimony. No substantive order (bail/verdict/adjournment) was issued—this is merely a procedural record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition record, not a case order. It records the testimony of witness Sathashivam (age 62) in Criminal Case 270/2024 before Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu on 26.05.2026. The witness testified regarding theft allegations and police investigation involving an accused named Boobalan, and confirmed his signatures on related documents (Ext. A2, A3, A4). During cross-examination, the witness stated he could not recall details about the accused's identification and denied giving false testimony. No substantive order (bail/verdict/adjournment) was issued—this is merely a procedural record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case