Chengalpattu taluk police vs Boobalan Poomalai — 269/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG060026052024
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-06-2024
Filing Number
2570/2024
Filing Date
07-06-2024
Registration No
269/2024
Registration Date
07-06-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
FIR Details
FIR Number
268
Police Station
CHENGALPATTU TALUK
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chengalpattu taluk police
Adv. Inspector Of Police Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station
Respondent(s)
Boobalan Poomalai
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Copies
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-05-2026 | Copies |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 269/2024 This document records the witness deposition of Sathashivam (Lw6/Pw2), a 62-year-old witness in criminal case 269/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Chengalpattu. The witness testified regarding a 2016 alleged theft incident involving stolen jewelry, corroborating police investigation details and identifying recovered items buried near the accused Boobalan's residence. During cross-examination, the witness expressed memory gaps about the accused's identity and testified he was asked to sign as a witness without initially knowing details. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct on 26.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 269/2024 This document records the witness deposition of Sathashivam (Lw6/Pw2), a 62-year-old witness in criminal case 269/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Chengalpattu. The witness testified regarding a 2016 alleged theft incident involving stolen jewelry, corroborating police investigation details and identifying recovered items buried near the accused Boobalan's residence. During cross-examination, the witness expressed memory gaps about the accused's identity and testified he was asked to sign as a witness without initially knowing details. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct on 26.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts