Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station vs KANAGARAJ — 458/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCG060023212025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-06-2025

Filing Number

2294/2025

Filing Date

03-06-2025

Registration No

458/2025

Registration Date

03-06-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

369

Police Station

CHENGALPATTU TALUK

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294(b),323

Petitioner(s)

Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station

Adv. Inspector Of Police Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station

Respondent(s)

KANAGARAJ

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

30-03-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

Questioning

25-03-2026

Questioning

18-03-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: STC 458/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused (Kanagaraj, Naresh, Ajithkumar, and Santhosh) under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. on March 30, 2026, finding them not guilty of offences under IPC Sections 294(b) and 323. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The primary witness (Robinson, the complainant) did not testify regarding the alleged date of occurrence, obscene words, or the attack, rendering his evidence unreliable. The investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient without corroborating witness evidence. The court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused due to inadequate evidence incriminating them for the alleged public indecency and simple hurt charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STC 458/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused (Kanagaraj, Naresh, Ajithkumar, and Santhosh) under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. on March 30, 2026, finding them not guilty of offences under IPC Sections 294(b) and 323. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The primary witness (Robinson, the complainant) did not testify regarding the alleged date of occurrence, obscene words, or the attack, rendering his evidence unreliable. The investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient without corroborating witness evidence. The court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused due to inadequate evidence incriminating them for the alleged public indecency and simple hurt charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case