Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station vs KANAGARAJ — 458/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCG060023212025

e-Filing Number

01-06-2025

Filing Number

2294/2025

Filing Date

03-Jun-2025

Registration No

458/2025

Registration Date

03-Jun-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

369

Police Station

CHENGALPATTU TALUK

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station

    Adv. Inspector Of Police Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANAGARAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: STC 458/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused (Kanagaraj, Naresh, Ajithkumar, and Santhosh) under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. on March 30, 2026, finding them not guilty of offences under IPC Sections 294(b) and 323. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The primary witness (Robinson, the complainant) did not testify regarding the alleged date of occurrence, obscene words, or the attack, rendering his evidence unreliable. The investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient without corroborating witness evidence. The court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused due to inadequate evidence incriminating them for the alleged public indecency and simple hurt charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  12. 01-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  13. 23-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  14. 28-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  15. 12-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  16. 09-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  17. 04-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  18. 03-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 03-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 458/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STC 458/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused (Kanagaraj, Naresh, Ajithkumar, and Santhosh) under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. on March 30, 2026, finding them not guilty of offences under IPC Sections 294(b) and 323. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The primary witness (Robinson, the complainant) did not testify regarding the alleged date of occurrence, obscene words, or the attack, rendering his evidence unreliable. The investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient without corroborating witness evidence. The court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused due to inadequate evidence incriminating them for the alleged public indecency and simple hurt charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case