PARAMASIVAM vs Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station — 1475/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(III)BNSS. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 18th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG060021772025

e-Filing Number

14-05-2025

Filing Number

2155/2025

Filing Date

23-May-2025

Registration No

1475/2025

Registration Date

23-May-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

Decision Date

18-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(III)BNSS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAMASIVAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Paramasivam v. Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station (Crl.M.P. 1475/2025) The court dismissed Paramasivam's petition seeking FIR registration against an ADSP for allegedly affixing an incorrect date seal on an RTI application. The court found the complaint legally unmaintainable on multiple grounds: Section 21 of the RTI Act 2005 provides statutory protection for good-faith acts by public officers; the allegations did not constitute the essential ingredients of Section 201 BNS 2023; and mandatory procedural requirements were violated, including failure to issue statutory notice under Section 53 of the Tamil Nadu District Police Act 1859 and non-compliance with Madras High Court directives requiring such complaints be presented before the Chief Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Reopen

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Reopen

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Reopen

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Reopen

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  11. 24-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  12. 03-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  15. 13-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  16. 29-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  18. 26-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  19. 12-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  20. 21-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  21. 16-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

  22. 23-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 23-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1475/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Paramasivam v. Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station (Crl.M.P. 1475/2025) The court dismissed Paramasivam's petition seeking FIR registration against an ADSP for allegedly affixing an incorrect date seal on an RTI application. The court found the complaint legally unmaintainable on multiple grounds: Section 21 of the RTI Act 2005 provides statutory protection for good-faith acts by public officers; the allegations did not constitute the essential ingredients of Section 201 BNS 2023; and mandatory procedural requirements were violated, including failure to issue statutory notice under Section 53 of the Tamil Nadu District Police Act 1859 and non-compliance with Madras High Court directives requiring such complaints be presented before the Chief Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case