PARAMASIVAM vs Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station — 1475/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(III)BNSS. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 18th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG060021772025
e-Filing Number
14-05-2025
Filing Number
2155/2025
Filing Date
23-05-2025
Registration No
1475/2025
Registration Date
23-05-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
18th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARAMASIVAM
Respondent(s)
Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Disposed
Orders
Reopen
Reopen
Reopen
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Orders |
| 27-03-2026 | Reopen |
| 16-03-2026 | Reopen |
| 09-03-2026 | Reopen |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Paramasivam v. Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station (Crl.M.P. 1475/2025) The court dismissed Paramasivam's petition seeking FIR registration against an ADSP for allegedly affixing an incorrect date seal on an RTI application. The court found the complaint legally unmaintainable on multiple grounds: Section 21 of the RTI Act 2005 provides statutory protection for good-faith acts by public officers; the allegations did not constitute the essential ingredients of Section 201 BNS 2023; and mandatory procedural requirements were violated, including failure to issue statutory notice under Section 53 of the Tamil Nadu District Police Act 1859 and non-compliance with Madras High Court directives requiring such complaints be presented before the Chief Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Paramasivam v. Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station (Crl.M.P. 1475/2025) The court dismissed Paramasivam's petition seeking FIR registration against an ADSP for allegedly affixing an incorrect date seal on an RTI application. The court found the complaint legally unmaintainable on multiple grounds: Section 21 of the RTI Act 2005 provides statutory protection for good-faith acts by public officers; the allegations did not constitute the essential ingredients of Section 201 BNS 2023; and mandatory procedural requirements were violated, including failure to issue statutory notice under Section 53 of the Tamil Nadu District Police Act 1859 and non-compliance with Madras High Court directives requiring such complaints be presented before the Chief Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts