PARAMASIVAM vs Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station — 1474/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(III)BNSS. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 18th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG060021762025
e-Filing Number
14-05-2025
Filing Number
2154/2025
Filing Date
23-05-2025
Registration No
1474/2025
Registration Date
23-05-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
18th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARAMASIVAM
Respondent(s)
Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Disposed
Orders
Reopen
Reopen
Reopen
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Orders |
| 27-03-2026 | Reopen |
| 16-03-2026 | Reopen |
| 09-03-2026 | Reopen |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Paramasivam v. Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station (Crl.M.P. No. 1474/2025) The court dismissed the petitioner's request to register an FIR against a Public Information Officer for allegedly providing incorrect information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The court held that Section 21 of the RTI Act provides statutory protection to officers acting in good faith, and disputes over RTI information accuracy fall within the RTI Act's own remedial framework—requiring appeals before appellate authorities and the Information Commission, not criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Paramasivam v. Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station (Crl.M.P. No. 1474/2025) The court dismissed the petitioner's request to register an FIR against a Public Information Officer for allegedly providing incorrect information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The court held that Section 21 of the RTI Act provides statutory protection to officers acting in good faith, and disputes over RTI information accuracy fall within the RTI Act's own remedial framework—requiring appeals before appellate authorities and the Information Commission, not criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts