CBCID VPC ST Thomas Mount Police Station vs Raja — 52/2023
Case under Copyright Act, 1957 Section 51 R/w 63. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG060019162023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
1913/2023
Filing Date
14-02-2023
Registration No
52/2023
Registration Date
14-02-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu
FIR Details
FIR Number
82
Police Station
CBCID, VPC, ST. THOMAS MOUNT, CHENNAI
Year
2006
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CBCID VPC ST Thomas Mount Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Raja
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Judgement |
| 19-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 52/2023 Summary This is a witness deposition (PW-4) in a Copyright Act case against accused Raja, heard on 06.03.2026 before Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Chengalpattu. The witness, an investigating officer, testified regarding a search conducted on 29.09.2006 at Raja's Electronics shop in Tiruvathira under FIR 82/2006 (Sections 51 r/w 63 Copyright Act 1957), where 310 unlicensed CDs were seized. The witness was cross-examined extensively on procedural details and credibility issues, including inconsistencies in timestamps and lack of independent witnesses. Re-examination was closed and the deposition was recorded as admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 52/2023 Summary This is a witness deposition (PW-4) in a Copyright Act case against accused Raja, heard on 06.03.2026 before Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Chengalpattu. The witness, an investigating officer, testified regarding a search conducted on 29.09.2006 at Raja's Electronics shop in Tiruvathira under FIR 82/2006 (Sections 51 r/w 63 Copyright Act 1957), where 310 unlicensed CDs were seized. The witness was cross-examined extensively on procedural details and credibility issues, including inconsistencies in timestamps and lack of independent witnesses. Re-examination was closed and the deposition was recorded as admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts