NAGARAJAN vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 676/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG060018282026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

1803/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Registration No

676/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

CBCID, KANCHIPURAM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

NAGARAJAN

Adv. Muneeswaran Muthusami

Respondent(s)

INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Hearing History

Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: 676/2026 (Nagarajan v. Inspector of Police) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed N. Nagarajan's bail petition in a land fraud case involving alleged impersonation and document forgery. Nagarajan was accused of impersonating P. Nithyanandam to execute power of attorney documents and facilitate illegal land grabbing, receiving cash payments for his role in the conspiracy. The court denied bail because the investigation remained in preliminary stages, with pending fingerprint analysis, money trail investigation, and concerns that release would obstruct ongoing inquiries and witness testimony in this serious offence against public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 676/2026 (Nagarajan v. Inspector of Police) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed N. Nagarajan's bail petition in a land fraud case involving alleged impersonation and document forgery. Nagarajan was accused of impersonating P. Nithyanandam to execute power of attorney documents and facilitate illegal land grabbing, receiving cash payments for his role in the conspiracy. The court denied bail because the investigation remained in preliminary stages, with pending fingerprint analysis, money trail investigation, and concerns that release would obstruct ongoing inquiries and witness testimony in this serious offence against public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case