Helal Sekh vs Guduvancherry Police Station — 645/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG060017302026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
1705/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
645/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
GUDUVANCHERRY PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Helal Sekh
Adv. KESAVAN G
Respondent(s)
-
1.Guduvancherry Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 645/2026 - Helal Sekh v. Guduvancherry Police Station The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu dismissed Helal Sekh's bail application on 24 March 2026. The court found that the investigation was in preliminary stages, the accused faced serious charges under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS (theft-related offences), and had a prior criminal history suggesting habitual offender status. The court determined that bail release posed risks of absconding, evidence tampering, and re-offending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
23-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
16-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
12-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 645/2026
Case Summary: 645/2026 - Helal Sekh v. Guduvancherry Police Station The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu dismissed Helal Sekh's bail application on 24 March 2026. The court found that the investigation was in preliminary stages, the accused faced serious charges under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS (theft-related offences), and had a prior criminal history suggesting habitual offender status. The court determined that bail release posed risks of absconding, evidence tampering, and re-offending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts