Vicky @ Vignesh vs Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station — 336/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 01st April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG060009042026
Filing Number
900/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
336/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
213
Police Station
CHENGALPATTU TALUK
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vicky @ Vignesh
Respondent(s)
Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Disposed
Enquiry
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 16-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CMP.No.336/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu granted bail to Vicky @ Vignesh (age 31), arrested for theft under Section 379 IPC on 23.12.2025, after spending 100 days in judicial custody. The court allowed the bail application considering the investigation's near completion, the accused's age, and recovered case property, imposing conditions including a Rs.10,000 own bond, two sureties of Rs.10,000 each (one relative), daily police reporting for 30 days, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMP.No.336/2026 The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Chengalpattu granted bail to Vicky @ Vignesh (age 31), arrested for theft under Section 379 IPC on 23.12.2025, after spending 100 days in judicial custody. The court allowed the bail application considering the investigation's near completion, the accused's age, and recovered case property, imposing conditions including a Rs.10,000 own bond, two sureties of Rs.10,000 each (one relative), daily police reporting for 30 days, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts