CBCID, Kancheepuram P.S., vs N.Natarajan Advocate - VIJAYAKUMAR.R — 800088/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 465,468,471,120(B). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG060008212017
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
800468/2017
Filing Date
24-04-2017
Registration No
800088/2017
Registration Date
24-04-2017
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu
FIR Details
FIR Number
01
Police Station
CBCID, KANCHIPURAM
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CBCID, Kancheepuram P.S.,
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
N.Natarajan Advocate - VIJAYAKUMAR.R
Loganathan
Adv. VIJAYAKUMAR.R
Swaminathan
Adv. SANTHANAM.G.
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (PW-16) in Criminal Case 88/2017 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpattu. A 63-year-old retired forensic science officer testified on 02.02.2026 regarding handwriting and document analysis he conducted on exhibits related to FIR 1/2015 (CBCID Kancheepuram). The witness marked and analyzed various documents, signatures and handwriting samples with assigned markings (Q1-Q6, A1-A24), providing expert opinions on document authenticity. Cross-examination by the defence revealed no request to examine documents as forged, and the witness maintained his analysis was conducted properly and his report was accurate. The case proceeded with witness testimony recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (PW-16) in Criminal Case 88/2017 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpattu. A 63-year-old retired forensic science officer testified on 02.02.2026 regarding handwriting and document analysis he conducted on exhibits related to FIR 1/2015 (CBCID Kancheepuram). The witness marked and analyzed various documents, signatures and handwriting samples with assigned markings (Q1-Q6, A1-A24), providing expert opinions on document authenticity. Cross-examination by the defence revealed no request to examine documents as forged, and the witness maintained his analysis was conducted properly and his report was accurate. The case proceeded with witness testimony recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts