Cyber Crime Police Station, Chengalpattu vs Ramesh — 21/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG060008102023
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
810/2023
Filing Date
23-01-2023
Registration No
21/2023
Registration Date
23-01-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu
FIR Details
FIR Number
27
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION CHENGALPATTU
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Cyber Crime Police Station, Chengalpattu
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ramesh
Mohammed Haaris
Mohammed Thoufiq
Sudharsan
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate-I, Chengalpattu
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 21/2023 This is a cyber fraud case heard at Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Chengalpattu. The witness depositions (dated 08.05.2025) document a complaint filed by the Cyber Crime Police Station against four accused (Ramesh, Mohammed Haaris, Mohammed Thoufiq, and one unnamed). The complainant posted an iPhone 13 for sale on Facebook for ₹39,000, which was transferred via online payment; however, an empty box was received instead. Following police investigation and subsequent settlement negotiations, the complainant and accused reached a compromise and the money was returned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 21/2023 This is a cyber fraud case heard at Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Chengalpattu. The witness depositions (dated 08.05.2025) document a complaint filed by the Cyber Crime Police Station against four accused (Ramesh, Mohammed Haaris, Mohammed Thoufiq, and one unnamed). The complainant posted an iPhone 13 for sale on Facebook for ₹39,000, which was transferred via online payment; however, an empty box was received instead. Following police investigation and subsequent settlement negotiations, the complainant and accused reached a compromise and the money was returned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts