M/s Lotus Info Serve, rep by its Propr., Rajasekar vs M/s One works BIL Technologies Pvt., LTd., and another — 454/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG010071152021

Filing Number

1969/2021

Filing Date

21-Oct-2021

Registration No

454/2021

Registration Date

21-Oct-2021

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

3-Addl. District Judge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Lotus Info Serve, rep by its Propr., Rajasekar

    Adv. Vijaya Baskar M V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s One works BIL Technologies Pvt., LTd., and another

  2. 2.M/s Pennar Industries Ltd., rep by its M.D.,

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  7. 21-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  8. 31-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  9. 13-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  11. 18-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  12. 18-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  13. 04-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  14. 18-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: OS.454/2021 Case: Lotus Info Serve (Petitioner) v. One Works BIL Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Pennar Industries Ltd. (Respondents) Hearing Date: 18.06.2025 Outcome: The case has been dismissed/closed (marked "இல்லை" - "No" to further proceedings). The petitioner's testimony during cross-examination revealed critical deficiencies in the case. The petitioner admitted to: (1) failing to specify exact details of computers rented to the first respondent in initial pleadings despite having invoices; (2) not formally notifying the second respondent (Pennar Industries) before filing the suit; and (3) not reviewing the respondent's counter-affidavit which stated that Pennar Industries held shareholding in One Works BIL Technologies and divested its shares in 2021. The court found these omissions and lack of due diligence rendered the case non-maintainable, leading to its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 18-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  16. 03-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Addl. District Judge

  17. 06-Mar-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 06-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Addl. District Judge

  19. 23-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Addl. District Judge

  20. 21-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Addl. District Judge

  21. 28-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Addl. District Judge

  22. 26-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Addl. District Judge

  23. 27-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Addl. District Judge

  24. 11-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Addl. District Judge

  25. 10-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Addl. District Judge

  26. 08-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Addl. District Judge

  27. 29-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Addl. District Judge

  28. 25-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Addl. District Judge

  29. 30-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Addl. District Judge

  30. 12-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Addl. District Judge

  31. 27-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Addl. District Judge

  32. 07-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Addl. District Judge

  33. 27-Jun-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  34. 20-Mar-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  35. 23-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Addl. District Judge

  36. 28-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District Judge

  37. 05-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District Judge

  38. 02-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District Judge

  39. 01-Jul-2022

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District Judge

  40. 01-Apr-2022

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District Judge

  41. 10-Jan-2022

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District Judge

  42. 24-Nov-2021

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District Judge

  43. 21-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 21-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 454/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS.454/2021 Case: Lotus Info Serve (Petitioner) v. One Works BIL Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Pennar Industries Ltd. (Respondents) Hearing Date: 18.06.2025 Outcome: The case has been dismissed/closed (marked "இல்லை" - "No" to further proceedings). The petitioner's testimony during cross-examination revealed critical deficiencies in the case. The petitioner admitted to: (1) failing to specify exact details of computers rented to the first respondent in initial pleadings despite having invoices; (2) not formally notifying the second respondent (Pennar Industries) before filing the suit; and (3) not reviewing the respondent's counter-affidavit which stated that Pennar Industries held shareholding in One Works BIL Technologies and divested its shares in 2021. The court found these omissions and lack of due diligence rendered the case non-maintainable, leading to its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case