A Petchimuthu vs Manamalli — 71/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th June 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNCG010054782023
Filing Number
4100/2023
Filing Date
12-07-2023
Registration No
71/2023
Registration Date
18-07-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
06th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A Petchimuthu
Adv. RAVIKUMAR MUNUSWAMY
Respondent(s)
Manamalli
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 15-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 07-03-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 71/2023 The appellate court dismissed A. Petchimuthu's appeal and confirmed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Petchimuthu had borrowed Rs. 1,75,000 from Manamalli in 2011 and issued a cheque for Rs. 2,48,500 in 2014 toward repayment, which dishonored due to account closure. The court found the accused failed to rebut statutory presumptions of debt after ignoring a demand notice, and minor discrepancies in cheque amount and missing cheque number in the notice did not invalidate prosecution. The 3-month imprisonment and Rs. 3,50,000 compensation sentence were upheld as proportionate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 71/2023 The appellate court dismissed A. Petchimuthu's appeal and confirmed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Petchimuthu had borrowed Rs. 1,75,000 from Manamalli in 2011 and issued a cheque for Rs. 2,48,500 in 2014 toward repayment, which dishonored due to account closure. The court found the accused failed to rebut statutory presumptions of debt after ignoring a demand notice, and minor discrepancies in cheque amount and missing cheque number in the notice did not invalidate prosecution. The 3-month imprisonment and Rs. 3,50,000 compensation sentence were upheld as proportionate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts