Balaji Pachiyappan , rep by his power agent S Janaki Gayathri vs Pachiyappan and 2 others — 296/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a), 37(2). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

Trial Next hearing 24-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG010032122023

Filing Number

1379/2023

Filing Date

19-Apr-2023

Registration No

296/2023

Registration Date

01-Jun-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

3-Addl. District Judge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a), 37(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balaji Pachiyappan , rep by his power agent S Janaki Gayathri

    Adv. Sashikumar PT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pachiyappan and 2 others

  2. 2.Sasirekai

  3. 3.Kangeyanpachaiyappan

Case History

  1. 24-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Addl. District Judge

  3. 09-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 25-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 04-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District Judge

  6. 18-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Addl. District Judge

  7. 24-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Addl. District Judge

  8. 18-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Addl. District Judge

  9. 15-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl. District Judge

  10. 05-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl. District Judge

  11. 31-Jul-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District Judge

  12. 25-Jun-2024

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S.296/2023, I.A.No.4/2024 The Kancheepuram District Court allowed the defendants' petition to set aside an ex parte order dated 16.10.2023. The defendants, who reside in the USA, were declared ex parte for failing to file vakalatnama (power of attorney) and appear on 16.10.2023. The court found their explanation credible—vakalatnama was filed on 3.7.2023 but overlooked by the registry, and counsel's sudden illness prevented appearance. The petition was allowed to give defendants opportunity to contest the property division suit on merits, conditioned on paying Rs.2,000 costs by 30.7.2024, with case called on 31.7.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 25-Jun-2024

    Orders

    Addl. District Judge

  14. 30-Apr-2024

    Orders

    Addl. District Judge

  15. 19-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  16. 19-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  17. 05-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  18. 04-Jan-2024

    Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  19. 08-Nov-2023

    Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  20. 16-Oct-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  21. 16-Oct-2023

    Arguments

    Addl. District Judge

  22. 31-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District Judge

  23. 03-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District Judge

  24. 01-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 19-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 296/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S.296/2023, I.A.No.4/2024 The Kancheepuram District Court allowed the defendants' petition to set aside an ex parte order dated 16.10.2023. The defendants, who reside in the USA, were declared ex parte for failing to file vakalatnama (power of attorney) and appear on 16.10.2023. The court found their explanation credible—vakalatnama was filed on 3.7.2023 but overlooked by the registry, and counsel's sudden illness prevented appearance. The petition was allowed to give defendants opportunity to contest the property division suit on merits, conditioned on paying Rs.2,000 costs by 30.7.2024, with case called on 31.7.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case