A. Palani vs S. Perumal — 174/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCG010029442021
Filing Number
785/2021
Filing Date
15-Apr-2021
Registration No
174/2021
Registration Date
16-Apr-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A. Palani
Adv. Sugumar.R
Respondent(s)
-
1.S. Perumal
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Steps
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Steps
Principal District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: I.A.No.2/2021 in O.S.No.174/2021 Outcome: The petition (I.A.No.2/2021) is disposed of. The court accepted the security furnished by the respondent and rejected the petitioner's objections demanding property attachment before judgment. No costs awarded. Key Facts: Petitioner lent Rs.2.5 crore to respondent (textile businessman) via promissory notes (2018-2019) at 12% interest. After respondent defaulted, petitioner sought security/pre-judgment property attachment, fearing respondent would sell assets. Respondent denied receiving funds, claiming promissory notes were forged, and eventually furnished property security with sale deed, encumbrance certificate, and valuation report. Reasoning: The court found the respondent's security adequately supported by certified documents and an undertaking not to alienate properties. Absent concrete litigation details from petitioner, the court found no foul play. The court noted petitioner lent substantial cash without obtaining initial security—a relevant circumstance weakening petitioner's position for attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Nov-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
20-Jan-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
09-Dec-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
20-Nov-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
25-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
14-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
15-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
09-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
02-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
20-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Amendment
Principal District Judge
-
16-Oct-2023
Amendment
Principal District Judge
-
20-Sep-2023
Amendment
Principal District Judge
-
01-Sep-2023
Amendment
Principal District Judge
-
26-Jul-2023
Amendment
Principal District Judge
-
14-Jul-2023
Amendment
Principal District Judge
-
24-Apr-2023
Amendment
Principal District Judge
-
27-Mar-2023
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
27-Mar-2023
Amendment
Principal District Judge
-
03-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
22-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
01-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
20-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
19-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
30-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
14-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
11-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
04-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
01-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
08-Apr-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
20-Jan-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
13-Dec-2021
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
01-Dec-2021
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
17-Nov-2021
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
27-Oct-2021
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
26-Oct-2021
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
05-Oct-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
28-Sep-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
27-Sep-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
22-Sep-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
26-Aug-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
04-Aug-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jul-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jun-2021
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
16-Apr-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 174/2021
Case Summary: I.A.No.2/2021 in O.S.No.174/2021 Outcome: The petition (I.A.No.2/2021) is disposed of. The court accepted the security furnished by the respondent and rejected the petitioner's objections demanding property attachment before judgment. No costs awarded. Key Facts: Petitioner lent Rs.2.5 crore to respondent (textile businessman) via promissory notes (2018-2019) at 12% interest. After respondent defaulted, petitioner sought security/pre-judgment property attachment, fearing respondent would sell assets. Respondent denied receiving funds, claiming promissory notes were forged, and eventually furnished property security with sale deed, encumbrance certificate, and valuation report. Reasoning: The court found the respondent's security adequately supported by certified documents and an undertaking not to alienate properties. Absent concrete litigation details from petitioner, the court found no foul play. The court noted petitioner lent substantial cash without obtaining initial security—a relevant circumstance weakening petitioner's position for attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts