Anitha and 2 others vs Haridoss and another — 166/2024

Case under Indiansuccessionact Section 276. Status: Additional Counter. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNCG010027242024

Additional Counter

Next Hearing

20th July 2026

e-Filing Number

23-04-2024

Filing Number

1321/2024

Filing Date

10-06-2024

Registration No

166/2024

Registration Date

10-06-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Acts & Sections

IndianSuccessionAct Section 276

Petitioner(s)

Anitha and 2 others

Adv. Asokan K

Minor Rasswanth G rep by natural guardian Anitha

Minor Vissruth G

Respondent(s)

Haridoss and another

Vaithegi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

29-04-2026

Additional Counter

16-03-2026

Additional Counter

12-01-2026

Additional Counter

12-11-2025

Amendment

06-10-2025

Amendment

Interim Orders

06-10-2025
Copy of Order
06-10-2025
Copy of Order

Case Summary: OP No. 166/2024 The Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu allowed the petition filed by Anitha and minors Rasswanth and Vissruth to amend their original petition. The court permitted the amendment of the prayer from "Letters of Administration" to "Probate of Will" regarding a notarized will executed by the deceased husband Gopalakrishnan in Anitha's favour, treating the original prayer as a typographical error. The respondents' allegations regarding Will fabrication were noted as matters to be determined during trial of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OP No. 166/2024 The Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu allowed the petition filed by Anitha and minors Rasswanth and Vissruth to amend their original petition. The court permitted the amendment of the prayer from "Letters of Administration" to "Probate of Will" regarding a notarized will executed by the deceased husband Gopalakrishnan in Anitha's favour, treating the original prayer as a typographical error. The respondents' allegations regarding Will fabrication were noted as matters to be determined during trial of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case