S Mani vs Ambika and 3 others — 243/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 42(a),33(1). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCG010019182024
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
863/2024
Filing Date
23-04-2024
Registration No
243/2024
Registration Date
29-04-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
3-Addl. District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S Mani
Adv. VARADARAJAN K
Respondent(s)
Ambika and 3 others
Pankajammal @ Pankajavalli
G Chandrasekar
Kavitha
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl. District Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 15-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 03-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 06-10-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.No.243/2024 The Additional District Judge dismissed defendants Ambika and Pankajammal's petition to reject the plaintiff S Mani's plaint. The court found the suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement disclosed a valid cause of action, was filed within the limitation period, and was not barred by the Commercial Court Act since the transaction involved agricultural property, not a commercial venture. The petition under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was dismissed with no cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S.No.243/2024 The Additional District Judge dismissed defendants Ambika and Pankajammal's petition to reject the plaintiff S Mani's plaint. The court found the suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement disclosed a valid cause of action, was filed within the limitation period, and was not barred by the Commercial Court Act since the transaction involved agricultural property, not a commercial venture. The petition under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was dismissed with no cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts