V.R.T.Balaji vs Raja Annamalai and 2 others — 841/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 338. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 23rd March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010018562026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1103/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

841/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

CCB, TAMBARAM

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 338

Petitioner(s)

V.R.T.Balaji

Adv. Raja Simiyon Anthony D

Respondent(s)

Raja Annamalai and 2 others

R.Devaki

CCB Tambaram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Enquiry

16-03-2026

Issue of Service

12-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary of Case 841/2026 (V.R.T. Balaji v. Raja Annamalai and Others): The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raja Annamalai and R. Devaki, who were accused of cheating V.R.T. Balaji through an alleged property fraud scheme involving financial inducements, forged documents, and unauthorized property transfers. The court found the allegations grave, noting the accused operated as a syndicate targeting loan-seekers, the swindled amount remained unrecovered, co-accused remained unsecured, and the investigation was preliminary, warranting denial of bail to prevent prejudice to prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 841/2026 (V.R.T. Balaji v. Raja Annamalai and Others): The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raja Annamalai and R. Devaki, who were accused of cheating V.R.T. Balaji through an alleged property fraud scheme involving financial inducements, forged documents, and unauthorized property transfers. The court found the allegations grave, noting the accused operated as a syndicate targeting loan-seekers, the swindled amount remained unrecovered, co-accused remained unsecured, and the investigation was preliminary, warranting denial of bail to prevent prejudice to prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case