Anish Antony vs DCB Kanchipuram — 838/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,34. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 30th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010018552026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1102/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

838/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

DCB, KANCHIPURAM

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 420,34

Petitioner(s)

Anish Antony

Adv. MANUEL J

Respondent(s)

DCB Kanchipuram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

30-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Enquiry

25-03-2026

Enquiry

18-03-2026

Enquiry

16-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No.838/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Anish Antony, accused under IPC Sections 420 and 34 in connection with a case involving 14 Iranian BDS students whose studentship was terminated for failing the NEET examination. The court found that fees were subsequently refunded, evidence is documentary in nature with no tampering risk, the petitioner had no specific role in the alleged offense, and a co-accused was already granted bail. Bail was ordered on execution of Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties upon surrender within 15 days, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No.838/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Anish Antony, accused under IPC Sections 420 and 34 in connection with a case involving 14 Iranian BDS students whose studentship was terminated for failing the NEET examination. The court found that fees were subsequently refunded, evidence is documentary in nature with no tampering risk, the petitioner had no specific role in the alleged offense, and a co-accused was already granted bail. Bail was ordered on execution of Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties upon surrender within 15 days, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case