Sivaraj S vs Pallavaram Police Station — 821/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010018532026
Filing Number
1100/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
821/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
80
Police Station
PALLAVARAM
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sivaraj S
Adv. Anto Chrisbeen Jenitha.T
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pallavaram Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 821/2026 Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu granted bail to Sivaraj S, accused of criminal intimidation and theft (Rs. 500 snatched via online transfer during a construction site trespass under Section 309 BNS 2023). The court found him a first-time offender with no prior cases and permanent residence, posing no flight risk after 10 days custody. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties, subject to daily police reporting for 30 days and conditions against evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 821/2026
Case 821/2026 Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu granted bail to Sivaraj S, accused of criminal intimidation and theft (Rs. 500 snatched via online transfer during a construction site trespass under Section 309 BNS 2023). The court found him a first-time offender with no prior cases and permanent residence, posing no flight risk after 10 days custody. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties, subject to daily police reporting for 30 days and conditions against evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts