Roshan V vs Pallavaram Police Station — 823/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010018512026

Filing Number

1098/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

823/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

80

Police Station

PALLAVARAM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Roshan V

    Adv. Anto Chrisbeen Jenitha.T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pallavaram Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 823/2026 Summary: The court granted bail to Roshan V, accused of criminal intimidation and theft at a construction site under Section 309 BNS 2023. The judge found him to be a first-time offender with no criminal history, having spent 10 days in custody, and noted his permanent residence negated flight risk. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 823/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 823/2026 Summary: The court granted bail to Roshan V, accused of criminal intimidation and theft at a construction site under Section 309 BNS 2023. The judge found him to be a first-time offender with no criminal history, having spent 10 days in custody, and noted his permanent residence negated flight risk. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case