Mariyammal vs Thirukalukundram Police Station — 832/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010018482026

Filing Number

1095/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

832/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

THIRUKAZHUKUNDRAM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mariyammal

    Adv. Ajithkumar K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thirukalukundram Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: Case 832/2026 - Mariyammal v. Thirukalukundram Police Station The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu dismissed Mariyammal's anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 482 BNSS. The court found the petition infructuous because the prosecution confirmed no FIR had been registered against the petitioner, making anticipatory bail relief unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 14-May-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 832/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 832/2026 - Mariyammal v. Thirukalukundram Police Station The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu dismissed Mariyammal's anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 482 BNSS. The court found the petition infructuous because the prosecution confirmed no FIR had been registered against the petitioner, making anticipatory bail relief unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case