Mohanakrishnan and another vs Chithamur Police Station — 834/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 02nd April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010018462026
Filing Number
1093/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
834/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
CHITHAMUR PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohanakrishnan and another
Adv. Anbarasu.K
-
2.Seetha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chithamur Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition for the 1st petitioner (Mohanakrishnan) as not pressed, but granted anticipatory bail to the 2nd petitioner (Seetha) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b) and 118(1) for alleged assault and abusive language. Seetha was ordered released on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to daily police reporting for 15 days and conditions against tampering with evidence, based on her status as a first-time offender with no flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 834/2026
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition for the 1st petitioner (Mohanakrishnan) as not pressed, but granted anticipatory bail to the 2nd petitioner (Seetha) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b) and 118(1) for alleged assault and abusive language. Seetha was ordered released on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to daily police reporting for 15 days and conditions against tampering with evidence, based on her status as a first-time offender with no flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts