Lakshmi and 2 others vs DCB Chengalpattu Police Station — 836/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 416,420,464,471,205,34. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 02nd April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010018432026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1090/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

836/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

DCB CHENGALPATTU

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 416,420,464,471,205,34

Petitioner(s)

Lakshmi and 2 others

Adv. Sorubaraj.K

Jayakumar

Jayabalan

Respondent(s)

DCB Chengalpattu Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

02-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Orders

26-03-2026

Enquiry

24-03-2026

Enquiry

16-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Order
02-04-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: 836/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu granted anticipatory bail to Lakshmi (69), Jayakumar (45), and Jayabalan (38) in a property dispute case involving allegations of forgery and fraud under IPC sections 416, 420, 464, 468, 471, 205. The court found the dispute fundamentally civil in nature regarding property title ownership, noted the petitioners are first-time offenders with no prior criminal history, and determined the Public Prosecutor did not dispute their status as innocent purchasers. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond per petitioner, daily reporting for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 836/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu granted anticipatory bail to Lakshmi (69), Jayakumar (45), and Jayabalan (38) in a property dispute case involving allegations of forgery and fraud under IPC sections 416, 420, 464, 468, 471, 205. The court found the dispute fundamentally civil in nature regarding property title ownership, noted the petitioners are first-time offenders with no prior criminal history, and determined the Public Prosecutor did not dispute their status as innocent purchasers. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond per petitioner, daily reporting for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case