Lakshmi and 2 others vs DCB Chengalpattu Police Station — 836/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 416,420,464,471,205,34. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 02nd April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010018432026
Filing Number
1090/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
836/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
DCB CHENGALPATTU
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmi and 2 others
Adv. Sorubaraj.K
Jayakumar
Jayabalan
Respondent(s)
DCB Chengalpattu Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Orders |
| 26-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 24-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 836/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu granted anticipatory bail to Lakshmi (69), Jayakumar (45), and Jayabalan (38) in a property dispute case involving allegations of forgery and fraud under IPC sections 416, 420, 464, 468, 471, 205. The court found the dispute fundamentally civil in nature regarding property title ownership, noted the petitioners are first-time offenders with no prior criminal history, and determined the Public Prosecutor did not dispute their status as innocent purchasers. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond per petitioner, daily reporting for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 836/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu granted anticipatory bail to Lakshmi (69), Jayakumar (45), and Jayabalan (38) in a property dispute case involving allegations of forgery and fraud under IPC sections 416, 420, 464, 468, 471, 205. The court found the dispute fundamentally civil in nature regarding property title ownership, noted the petitioners are first-time offenders with no prior criminal history, and determined the Public Prosecutor did not dispute their status as innocent purchasers. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs.10,000 bond per petitioner, daily reporting for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts