Balamurugan vs CCB Tambaram — 827/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,465,468,471. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 01st April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010018302026
Filing Number
1078/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
827/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
CCB, TAMBARAM
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Balamurugan
Adv. Praveen Kumar P
Respondent(s)
-
1.CCB Tambaram
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CMP No. 827 of 2026 The court granted bail to Balamurugan, accused of forgery and fraud charges (IPC §419, 420, 465, 468, 471) involving a forged power deed used to sell property. The judge found that Balamurugan appeared to be merely a witness to the disputed sale deed rather than a principal offender, was a first-time accused with no flight risk, and had already spent 26 days in judicial custody. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 827/2026
Case Summary: CMP No. 827 of 2026 The court granted bail to Balamurugan, accused of forgery and fraud charges (IPC §419, 420, 465, 468, 471) involving a forged power deed used to sell property. The judge found that Balamurugan appeared to be merely a witness to the disputed sale deed rather than a principal offender, was a first-time accused with no flight risk, and had already spent 26 days in judicial custody. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts