Minor F S Freeziasherin Rep by Natural guardian/Father Mr Franklin Manova vs Nil — 70/2025
Case under Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 Section Section8. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNCG010016832025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2025
Filing Number
612/2025
Filing Date
28-03-2025
Registration No
70/2025
Registration Date
07-04-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Minor F S Freeziasherin Rep by Natural guardian/Father Mr Franklin Manova
Adv. Muthuraman
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 16-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 11-03-2026 | Orders |
| 09-02-2026 | Orders |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OP 70/2025 In this petition filed before the Principal District Court, Chengalpattu on January 9, 2026, a minor represented by natural guardian Franklin Manova seeks to protect their inheritance interests. The case involves a property purchase agreement where the minor's share from a 1.3 crore property sale (valued at 7.8 lakhs for the minor's 1/15 share) needs to be deposited with the court for safeguarding. The respondent (identified as Pushpakanthan Krishnan) stated willingness to deposit the amount and submitted identification documents for verification as required under the 1973 rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OP 70/2025 In this petition filed before the Principal District Court, Chengalpattu on January 9, 2026, a minor represented by natural guardian Franklin Manova seeks to protect their inheritance interests. The case involves a property purchase agreement where the minor's share from a 1.3 crore property sale (valued at 7.8 lakhs for the minor's 1/15 share) needs to be deposited with the court for safeguarding. The respondent (identified as Pushpakanthan Krishnan) stated willingness to deposit the amount and submitted identification documents for verification as required under the 1973 rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts