Minor F S Freeziasherin Rep by Natural guardian/Father Mr Franklin Manova vs Nil — 70/2025

Case under Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 Section Section8. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNCG010016832025

For further Proceedings

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2025

Filing Number

612/2025

Filing Date

28-03-2025

Registration No

70/2025

Registration Date

07-04-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Acts & Sections

GUARDIANS & WARDS ACT, 1890 Section Section8

Petitioner(s)

Minor F S Freeziasherin Rep by Natural guardian/Father Mr Franklin Manova

Adv. Muthuraman

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

30-04-2026

For further Proceedings

16-04-2026

For further Proceedings

16-03-2026

Orders

11-03-2026

Orders

09-02-2026

Orders

Interim Orders

09-01-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: OP 70/2025 In this petition filed before the Principal District Court, Chengalpattu on January 9, 2026, a minor represented by natural guardian Franklin Manova seeks to protect their inheritance interests. The case involves a property purchase agreement where the minor's share from a 1.3 crore property sale (valued at 7.8 lakhs for the minor's 1/15 share) needs to be deposited with the court for safeguarding. The respondent (identified as Pushpakanthan Krishnan) stated willingness to deposit the amount and submitted identification documents for verification as required under the 1973 rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OP 70/2025 In this petition filed before the Principal District Court, Chengalpattu on January 9, 2026, a minor represented by natural guardian Franklin Manova seeks to protect their inheritance interests. The case involves a property purchase agreement where the minor's share from a 1.3 crore property sale (valued at 7.8 lakhs for the minor's 1/15 share) needs to be deposited with the court for safeguarding. The respondent (identified as Pushpakanthan Krishnan) stated willingness to deposit the amount and submitted identification documents for verification as required under the 1973 rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case