Sumit Raj vs Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station — 677/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),75,77,78,296(b),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010015682026

Filing Number

928/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

677/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),75,77,78,296(b),351(2)
Information Technology Act 2000 Section 67

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sumit Raj

    Adv. Dilliraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to 22-year-old Sumit Raj, accused of sexually coercing a married woman by threatening to share intimate videos with her husband under BNS sections and IT Act provisions. The judge considered that Raj had spent 26 days in custody with substantial investigation completed, and imposed conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and prohibitions against evidence tampering and absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 677/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to 22-year-old Sumit Raj, accused of sexually coercing a married woman by threatening to share intimate videos with her husband under BNS sections and IT Act provisions. The judge considered that Raj had spent 26 days in custody with substantial investigation completed, and imposed conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and prohibitions against evidence tampering and absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case