M.Saranya vs Tambaram Police Station — 650/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010014742026

Case disposed

Filing Number

856/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

650/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

TAMBARAM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(2)

Petitioner(s)

M.Saranya

Adv. PRITHIVIRAJAN M

Respondent(s)

Tambaram Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Orders

13-03-2026

Enquiry

12-03-2026

Enquiry

11-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: Case 650/2026 (M. Saranya v. Tambaram Police Station) The court granted anticipatory bail to M. Saranya, accused of cheating (BNS sections 316(2), 318(2)), in a dispute involving Rs.82 lakh investment in a construction business. The court found the transaction occurred substantially through bank records, determined the dispute centered on profit percentage disagreement rather than outright fraud, and noted the petitioner had already attended police inquiry twice without evasion. Released on Rs.10,000 bond with conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days and a prohibition on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 650/2026 (M. Saranya v. Tambaram Police Station) The court granted anticipatory bail to M. Saranya, accused of cheating (BNS sections 316(2), 318(2)), in a dispute involving Rs.82 lakh investment in a construction business. The court found the transaction occurred substantially through bank records, determined the dispute centered on profit percentage disagreement rather than outright fraud, and noted the petitioner had already attended police inquiry twice without evasion. Released on Rs.10,000 bond with conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days and a prohibition on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case