V.Ashok vs CCB Tambaram — 631/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316, 319. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010014122026
Filing Number
840/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
631/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
CCB, TAMBARAM
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V.Ashok
Adv. Babu V
Respondent(s)
-
1.CCB Tambaram
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No.631 of 2026 V. Ashok's anticipatory bail petition was dismissed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu on March 23, 2026. Ashok sought bail apprehending arrest under sections 316 and 318 of BNS 2023 by CCB Tambaram, claiming the complaint was false and he was uninvolved in the alleged offence. The court rejected the petition primarily because no CSR or case had been formally registered against the petitioner at that stage, finding it premature to grant anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 631/2026
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No.631 of 2026 V. Ashok's anticipatory bail petition was dismissed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu on March 23, 2026. Ashok sought bail apprehending arrest under sections 316 and 318 of BNS 2023 by CCB Tambaram, claiming the complaint was false and he was uninvolved in the alleged offence. The court rejected the petition primarily because no CSR or case had been formally registered against the petitioner at that stage, finding it premature to grant anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts