S.Socrates vs T.Jose and 5 others — 100272/2015

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section VIIRule1CPC. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 08-Jul-2026 Today

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG010011582015

Filing Date

05-Oct-2015

Registration No

100272/2015

Registration Date

05-Oct-2015

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section VIIRule1CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Socrates

    Adv. Tr.S.Natarajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T.Jose and 5 others

  2. 2.Arjun Das

  3. 3.Sundarammal

  4. 4.P.V.Sundaram,

  5. 5.Paul Rose Builders Pvt Ltd rep by P.R.Paulson

  6. 6.Dual Structurals and Industries Pvt Ltd rep by its A.Anjaiah

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: S.Socrates v. T.Jose and Others (O.S.No.272/2015) The court allowed the petition to reopen I.A.No.4/2019, which sought to call original records from a prior suit (O.S.No.452/2008) to verify whether documents were originals or copies. The petitioner argued that certified copies alone could not establish authenticity to expose alleged fraud by the second defendant. The court found the petitioner's reasons "absolutely bonafide" and necessary to serve justice, noting the earlier order directing certified copies had no relevance to the actual issue raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  8. 05-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  10. 30-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  11. 18-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  12. 19-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  13. 21-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  14. 10-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  15. 12-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  16. 27-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  17. 06-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  18. 15-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  19. 27-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  20. 06-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  21. 05-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  22. 15-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  23. 18-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  24. 26-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  25. 22-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  26. 08-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  27. 20-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  28. 30-Oct-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  29. 18-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  30. 17-Jul-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  31. 05-Jun-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  32. 13-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  33. 06-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  34. 05-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  35. 14-Nov-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  36. 09-Nov-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  37. 12-Oct-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  38. 14-Sep-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  39. 17-Aug-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  40. 15-Jul-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  41. 12-Jul-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  42. 11-Jul-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  43. 22-Jun-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  44. 18-Apr-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  45. 06-Apr-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  46. 12-Jan-2022

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  47. 19-Nov-2021

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  48. 25-Oct-2021

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  49. 21-Sep-2021

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  50. 03-Aug-2021

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  51. 01-Jul-2021

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  52. 08-Apr-2021

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  53. 01-Apr-2021

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  54. 09-Mar-2021

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  55. 06-Jan-2021

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  56. 27-Nov-2020

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  57. 18-Sep-2020

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  58. 13-Jul-2020

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  59. 14-May-2020

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  60. 29-Apr-2020

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  61. 17-Apr-2020

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  62. 11-Feb-2020

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  63. 19-Dec-2019

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  64. 04-Oct-2019

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  65. 04-Sep-2019

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  66. 17-Aug-2019

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  67. 26-Jul-2019

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  68. 12-Jul-2019

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  69. 10-Jul-2019

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  70. 30-Apr-2019

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  71. 12-Mar-2019

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  72. 24-Jan-2019

    List / Special List

    Principal District Judge

  73. 12-Dec-2018

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  74. 12-Nov-2018

    List / Special List

    Principal District Judge

  75. 01-Oct-2018

    List / Special List

    Principal District Judge

  76. 31-Jul-2018

    List / Special List

    Principal District Judge

  77. 08-Jun-2018

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  78. 22-Apr-2018

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  79. 02-Apr-2018

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  80. 16-Mar-2018

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  81. 02-Mar-2018

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  82. 14-Feb-2018

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  83. 14-Nov-2017

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  84. 12-Oct-2017

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  85. 11-Sep-2017

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  86. 11-Aug-2017

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  87. 19-Jun-2017

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  88. 17-Apr-2017

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  89. 16-Mar-2017

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  90. 08-Feb-2017

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  91. 16-Dec-2016

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  92. 07-Nov-2016

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  93. 05-Oct-2016

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  94. 15-Sep-2016

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  95. 21-Jul-2016

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  96. 17-Jun-2016

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  97. 15-Apr-2016

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  98. 03-Mar-2016

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  99. 05-Feb-2016

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  100. 24-Nov-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  101. 05-Oct-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100272/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.Socrates v. T.Jose and Others (O.S.No.272/2015) The court allowed the petition to reopen I.A.No.4/2019, which sought to call original records from a prior suit (O.S.No.452/2008) to verify whether documents were originals or copies. The petitioner argued that certified copies alone could not establish authenticity to expose alleged fraud by the second defendant. The court found the petitioner's reasons "absolutely bonafide" and necessary to serve justice, noting the earlier order directing certified copies had no relevance to the actual issue raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case