S. Kalaivani vs J. Tharani — 116/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCG010010592022
Filing Number
369/2022
Filing Date
25-Feb-2022
Registration No
116/2022
Registration Date
09-Mar-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
3-Addl. District Judge
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S. Kalaivani
Adv. Marimuthu P
Respondent(s)
-
1.J. Tharani
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This case involves a dispute over financial transactions between the petitioner S. Kalaivani and the respondent J. Tharani. The petitioner claims she provided three loans (₹5 lakh on 03.03.2018, ₹3,50,000 on 29.10.2018, and ₹10 lakh on 18.06.2019) to the respondent, but disputes have arisen regarding repayment, documentation, and the respondent's claims about property sales proceeds. The petitioner filed receipts and bank documentation as evidence but contests the respondent's assertions regarding when and how the money was transferred or used. The case appears to involve disagreements over loan documentation, alleged property transactions, and conflicting accounts of financial dealings between the parties, with the petitioner challenging the respondent's version of events regarding the disposition of funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Addl. District Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
22-Apr-2025
Trial
Addl. District Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Trial
Addl. District Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Trial
Addl. District Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Trial
Addl. District Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Trial
Addl. District Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
Trial
Addl. District Judge
-
14-Jun-2024
Trial
Addl. District Judge
-
26-Mar-2024
Issues
Addl. District Judge
-
22-Jan-2024
Issues
Addl. District Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Issues
Addl. District Judge
-
28-Aug-2023
Issues
Addl. District Judge
-
15-Jun-2023
Issues
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Mar-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Addl. District Judge
-
22-Feb-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Addl. District Judge
-
03-Feb-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Addl. District Judge
-
07-Nov-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Addl. District Judge
-
30-Sep-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
22-Aug-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
08-Aug-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
10-Jun-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
13-Apr-2022
Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 116/2022
This case involves a dispute over financial transactions between the petitioner S. Kalaivani and the respondent J. Tharani. The petitioner claims she provided three loans (₹5 lakh on 03.03.2018, ₹3,50,000 on 29.10.2018, and ₹10 lakh on 18.06.2019) to the respondent, but disputes have arisen regarding repayment, documentation, and the respondent's claims about property sales proceeds. The petitioner filed receipts and bank documentation as evidence but contests the respondent's assertions regarding when and how the money was transferred or used. The case appears to involve disagreements over loan documentation, alleged property transactions, and conflicting accounts of financial dealings between the parties, with the petitioner challenging the respondent's version of events regarding the disposition of funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts