K Ganesh vs V.C.Thangamagan — 447/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 148. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010008792026
Filing Number
576/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
447/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
3-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K Ganesh
Adv. M Digvijayapandian
Respondent(s)
V.C.Thangamagan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl. District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Orders |
| 07-04-2026 | Orders |
| 26-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: K Ganesh v. V.C. Thangamagan (447/2026) The Additional District Judge at Chengalpattu allowed petitioner K Ganesh's application under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to release Rs. 4,20,000 (20% compensation deposit) held by the trial court. The respondent had been convicted under Section 138 N.I. Act and directed to pay Rs. 21 lakh compensation; he deposited 20% as a condition for suspending his sentence pending appeal. The court held that the appellate court has exclusive power to release such deposits and, applying Section 148 provisions, permitted immediate release to the petitioner, with the condition that if the respondent is acquitted in the pending appeal, the petitioner must redeposit the amount with accrued bank interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: K Ganesh v. V.C. Thangamagan (447/2026) The Additional District Judge at Chengalpattu allowed petitioner K Ganesh's application under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to release Rs. 4,20,000 (20% compensation deposit) held by the trial court. The respondent had been convicted under Section 138 N.I. Act and directed to pay Rs. 21 lakh compensation; he deposited 20% as a condition for suspending his sentence pending appeal. The court held that the appellate court has exclusive power to release such deposits and, applying Section 148 provisions, permitted immediate release to the petitioner, with the condition that if the respondent is acquitted in the pending appeal, the petitioner must redeposit the amount with accrued bank interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts