K Ganesh vs V.C.Thangamagan — 447/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 148. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010008792026

Case disposed

Filing Number

576/2026

Filing Date

12-02-2026

Registration No

447/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

3-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 148

Petitioner(s)

K Ganesh

Adv. M Digvijayapandian

Respondent(s)

V.C.Thangamagan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl. District Judge

15-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Orders

07-04-2026

Orders

26-03-2026

Orders

16-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: K Ganesh v. V.C. Thangamagan (447/2026) The Additional District Judge at Chengalpattu allowed petitioner K Ganesh's application under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to release Rs. 4,20,000 (20% compensation deposit) held by the trial court. The respondent had been convicted under Section 138 N.I. Act and directed to pay Rs. 21 lakh compensation; he deposited 20% as a condition for suspending his sentence pending appeal. The court held that the appellate court has exclusive power to release such deposits and, applying Section 148 provisions, permitted immediate release to the petitioner, with the condition that if the respondent is acquitted in the pending appeal, the petitioner must redeposit the amount with accrued bank interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: K Ganesh v. V.C. Thangamagan (447/2026) The Additional District Judge at Chengalpattu allowed petitioner K Ganesh's application under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to release Rs. 4,20,000 (20% compensation deposit) held by the trial court. The respondent had been convicted under Section 138 N.I. Act and directed to pay Rs. 21 lakh compensation; he deposited 20% as a condition for suspending his sentence pending appeal. The court held that the appellate court has exclusive power to release such deposits and, applying Section 148 provisions, permitted immediate release to the petitioner, with the condition that if the respondent is acquitted in the pending appeal, the petitioner must redeposit the amount with accrued bank interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case