Kousalya Srinivasan vs C Ramadurai and 3 others — 55/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCG010008672023
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
241/2023
Filing Date
01-02-2023
Registration No
55/2023
Registration Date
02-02-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kousalya Srinivasan
Adv. Rajesh Ramanathan
Respondent(s)
C Ramadurai and 3 others
Krishnan
Seshadri.C
Subadra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Restored
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 08-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 04-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 25-02-2026 | Restored |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 55/2023 Outcome: The petition filed by C. Krishnan (2nd defendant) to reject the plaint was allowed. The suit filed by Kousalya Srinivasan (plaintiff/1st respondent) seeking to declare a 1996 release deed null and void and for partition of property was rejected. The court found the suit barred by limitation (27 years after the 1996 deed), lacking cause of action, and vexatious, as the plaintiff herself was a signatory to the disputed release deed and cannot now claim her signature was forged without subjecting the property to endless litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 55/2023 Outcome: The petition filed by C. Krishnan (2nd defendant) to reject the plaint was allowed. The suit filed by Kousalya Srinivasan (plaintiff/1st respondent) seeking to declare a 1996 release deed null and void and for partition of property was rejected. The court found the suit barred by limitation (27 years after the 1996 deed), lacking cause of action, and vexatious, as the plaintiff herself was a signatory to the disputed release deed and cannot now claim her signature was forged without subjecting the property to endless litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts