Kousalya Srinivasan vs C Ramadurai and 3 others — 55/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2). Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG010008672023

Filing Number

241/2023

Filing Date

01-Feb-2023

Registration No

55/2023

Registration Date

02-Feb-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kousalya Srinivasan

    Adv. Rajesh Ramanathan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C Ramadurai and 3 others

  2. 2.Krishnan

  3. 3.Seshadri.C

  4. 4.Subadra

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Judge

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Judge

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Restored

    Principal District Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  9. 05-Mar-2025

    IAView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 55/2023 Outcome: The petition filed by C. Krishnan (2nd defendant) to reject the plaint was allowed. The suit filed by Kousalya Srinivasan (plaintiff/1st respondent) seeking to declare a 1996 release deed null and void and for partition of property was rejected. The court found the suit barred by limitation (27 years after the 1996 deed), lacking cause of action, and vexatious, as the plaintiff herself was a signatory to the disputed release deed and cannot now claim her signature was forged without subjecting the property to endless litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 05-Mar-2025

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  11. 27-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  12. 20-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  13. 05-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  14. 20-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  15. 20-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  16. 13-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  17. 15-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  18. 30-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  19. 15-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  20. 19-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  21. 13-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  22. 06-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  23. 12-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  24. 17-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  25. 26-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  26. 18-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  27. 24-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  28. 01-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  29. 11-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  30. 10-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  31. 09-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  32. 10-Apr-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  33. 08-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  34. 02-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 01-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 55/2023 Outcome: The petition filed by C. Krishnan (2nd defendant) to reject the plaint was allowed. The suit filed by Kousalya Srinivasan (plaintiff/1st respondent) seeking to declare a 1996 release deed null and void and for partition of property was rejected. The court found the suit barred by limitation (27 years after the 1996 deed), lacking cause of action, and vexatious, as the plaintiff herself was a signatory to the disputed release deed and cannot now claim her signature was forged without subjecting the property to endless litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case