Reliance Investment Developers. vs D.Dhandapani and others — 100121/2012
Case under Arbitrationandconciliationact Section 21rule11CPC. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNCG010008572012
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Date
05-12-2012
Registration No
100121/2012
Registration Date
05-12-2012
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Reliance Investment Developers.
Adv. Tr.A.Tamil Vanan
Respondent(s)
D.Dhandapani and others
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 04-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 26-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-10-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: E.A.No.87 of 2016 in E.P.No.121 of 2012 Court: Principal District Court, Kancheepuram at Chengalpattu Date: 24 November 2020 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court raised (cancelled) the attachment order dated 13.12.2013 against properties Item Nos. 1 and 3. Key Finding: The court held that petitioner C. Rajendran was a bona fide purchaser who acquired the properties in December 2010 through registered sale deeds before any attachment was ordered in 2013. Since the sale deed predated the attachment, the judgment debtor had no remaining interest to attach, and the attachment order was therefore invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: E.A.No.87 of 2016 in E.P.No.121 of 2012 Court: Principal District Court, Kancheepuram at Chengalpattu Date: 24 November 2020 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court raised (cancelled) the attachment order dated 13.12.2013 against properties Item Nos. 1 and 3. Key Finding: The court held that petitioner C. Rajendran was a bona fide purchaser who acquired the properties in December 2010 through registered sale deeds before any attachment was ordered in 2013. Since the sale deed predated the attachment, the judgment debtor had no remaining interest to attach, and the attachment order was therefore invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts