Sulaiman Sait M vs EDF-III,CCB Tambaram and another — 365/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,120B. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010006762026
Filing Number
450/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
365/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sulaiman Sait M
Adv. Ganesan S
Respondent(s)
-
1.EDF-III,CCB Tambaram and another
-
2.Semmancherry Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court allowed the petition and ordered the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur to return the petitioner's original Indian passport (No. L9174262) to him. The petitioner had surrendered his passport as a bail condition in 2023, but was subsequently dropped from charges after the investigating officer filed a final report finding no offense against him. The court held that retaining the passport serves no judicial purpose once the petitioner has been exonerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 365/2026
The court allowed the petition and ordered the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur to return the petitioner's original Indian passport (No. L9174262) to him. The petitioner had surrendered his passport as a bail condition in 2023, but was subsequently dropped from charges after the investigating officer filed a final report finding no offense against him. The court held that retaining the passport serves no judicial purpose once the petitioner has been exonerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts