Raja Annamalai and another vs CCB Tambaram — 352/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,420,120(B). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG010006482026
Filing Number
433/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
352/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Chengalpet
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
51
Police Station
CCB, TAMBARAM
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raja Annamalai and another
Adv. Vasanth D
R.Devaki
Respondent(s)
CCB Tambaram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 12-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 05-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raja Annamalai and R. Devaki, who were accused of cheating (IPC §406, 409, 420, 120B) in a property transaction scheme. The court found credible allegations that the accused, acting as part of a syndicate, fraudulently obtained property documents from the complainant under the pretext of providing financial assistance, then executed a sale deed transferring the property without his knowledge or consent. The court declined bail citing the gravity of offences, ongoing preliminary investigation, unsecured co-accused, unrecovered swindled amounts, and prior criminal antecedents of co-accused members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raja Annamalai and R. Devaki, who were accused of cheating (IPC §406, 409, 420, 120B) in a property transaction scheme. The court found credible allegations that the accused, acting as part of a syndicate, fraudulently obtained property documents from the complainant under the pretext of providing financial assistance, then executed a sale deed transferring the property without his knowledge or consent. The court declined bail citing the gravity of offences, ongoing preliminary investigation, unsecured co-accused, unrecovered swindled amounts, and prior criminal antecedents of co-accused members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts