Raja Annamalai and another vs CCB Tambaram — 352/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,420,120(B). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG010006482026

Case disposed

Filing Number

433/2026

Filing Date

03-02-2026

Registration No

352/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

CCB, TAMBARAM

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 406,420,420,120(B)

Petitioner(s)

Raja Annamalai and another

Adv. Vasanth D

R.Devaki

Respondent(s)

CCB Tambaram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Orders

16-03-2026

Enquiry

12-03-2026

Enquiry

05-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Order

The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raja Annamalai and R. Devaki, who were accused of cheating (IPC §406, 409, 420, 120B) in a property transaction scheme. The court found credible allegations that the accused, acting as part of a syndicate, fraudulently obtained property documents from the complainant under the pretext of providing financial assistance, then executed a sale deed transferring the property without his knowledge or consent. The court declined bail citing the gravity of offences, ongoing preliminary investigation, unsecured co-accused, unrecovered swindled amounts, and prior criminal antecedents of co-accused members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raja Annamalai and R. Devaki, who were accused of cheating (IPC §406, 409, 420, 120B) in a property transaction scheme. The court found credible allegations that the accused, acting as part of a syndicate, fraudulently obtained property documents from the complainant under the pretext of providing financial assistance, then executed a sale deed transferring the property without his knowledge or consent. The court declined bail citing the gravity of offences, ongoing preliminary investigation, unsecured co-accused, unrecovered swindled amounts, and prior criminal antecedents of co-accused members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case