Pitchapillai vs Ramalingam Advocate - Thiru.R.Manivannan.,B.Sc.,BL.,(D1,D — 31/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 3127(c). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCD240007522022

Filing Number

31/2022

Filing Date

30-Apr-2022

Registration No

31/2022

Registration Date

30-Apr-2022

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tittagudi

Judge

1-Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 3127(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pitchapillai

    Adv. Thiru.M.Pazhanimuthu, M.A.,B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramalingam Advocate - Thiru.R.Manivannan.,B.Sc.,BL.,(D1,D

  2. 2.Ramesh

  3. 3.The Thasildhar

  4. 4.The Assisstant District Collector

  5. 5.The Block Development Officer

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  9. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  11. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  13. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  15. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  16. 18-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    In OS.31/2022, witness Supraniyan (age 70) testified on August 18, 2025 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tittagudi. The witness's statement was recorded and admitted as evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The respondent failed to appear, resulting in a default judgment being issued against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  18. 06-Aug-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  19. 23-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 23-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  21. 14-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  22. 02-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  23. 25-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  24. 23-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  25. 18-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  26. 05-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  27. 16-Apr-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  28. 13-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  29. 28-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  30. 27-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  31. 09-Dec-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  32. 17-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  33. 11-Sep-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  34. 09-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  35. 10-Jul-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  36. 05-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  37. 26-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  38. 26-Apr-2024

    Restored

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  39. 28-Jun-2023

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  40. 28-Jun-2023

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

  41. 28-Jun-2023

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  42. 28-Jun-2023

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

  43. 28-Jun-2023

    Disposed

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  44. 19-Jun-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  45. 07-Jun-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  46. 28-Apr-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  47. 28-Mar-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  48. 20-Mar-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  49. 20-Feb-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  50. 31-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  51. 04-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  52. 08-Dec-2022

    Enquiry

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  53. 23-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  54. 16-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  55. 19-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  56. 09-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif, Tittakudi

  57. 30-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 30-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2022

casestatus.in Summary

In OS.31/2022, witness Supraniyan (age 70) testified on August 18, 2025 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tittagudi. The witness's statement was recorded and admitted as evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The respondent failed to appear, resulting in a default judgment being issued against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case