Joseph vs Machakenthiran — 58/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Charge abated/Discharged on 14th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCD190001042021
Filing Number
92/2021
Filing Date
03-Feb-2021
Registration No
58/2021
Registration Date
03-Feb-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kattumannarkoil
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Charge abated/Discharged
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Joseph
Adv. T.S. Stalin
Respondent(s)
-
1.Machakenthiran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2026
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2026
Batta
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Apr-2026
Steps
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Steps
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Steps
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Steps
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Steps
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2025
Steps
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Nov-2025
Steps
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2025
Steps
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Oct-2025
Steps
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Oct-2025
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2025
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-May-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: STC 58/2021 In this case filed under The Oaths Act 1969, the court examined a petition by Joseph (age 57) against Machakenthiran. The court, presided over by Judge M. Sam Eugine Jebakumar, conducted a chief examination and reviewed documentary evidence including bank statements and postal records dated from May 2018. The judgment sets out the procedural framework and evidence admitted but does not provide a final substantive ruling on the merits in the visible portions of this judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2024
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2024
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jan-2024
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Dec-2023
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2023
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2023
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Oct-2023
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Aug-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jun-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-May-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Mar-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Oct-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Sep-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jul-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-May-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2021
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2021
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Sep-2021
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jun-2021
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2021
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2021
Case Summary: STC 58/2021 In this case filed under The Oaths Act 1969, the court examined a petition by Joseph (age 57) against Machakenthiran. The court, presided over by Judge M. Sam Eugine Jebakumar, conducted a chief examination and reviewed documentary evidence including bank statements and postal records dated from May 2018. The judgment sets out the procedural framework and evidence admitted but does not provide a final substantive ruling on the merits in the visible portions of this judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts