Ramar vs IlamaiSundaram — 5/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderXXIRule11(A). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNCD160055702025
e-Filing Number
01-12-2025
Filing Number
89/2025
Filing Date
02-Dec-2025
Registration No
5/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipettai
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramar
Adv. P MOORTHIGAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.IlamaiSundaram
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2026
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2026
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case 5/2025 Summary On 20.04.2026, the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Pondicherry conducted witness examination in Original Suit No. 10 of 2024 under the Oaths Act 1969. Witness K. Ramar (age 47) was examined and his testimony was recorded in open court. The witness's statement was acknowledged as correct after being read over to him in the prescribed manner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2026
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2025
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2025
Case 5/2025 Summary On 20.04.2026, the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Pondicherry conducted witness examination in Original Suit No. 10 of 2024 under the Oaths Act 1969. Witness K. Ramar (age 47) was examined and his testimony was recorded in open court. The witness's statement was acknowledged as correct after being read over to him in the prescribed manner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts