Vivekanandan rep by Power Agent Narayanasamy vs Senthamaraikannan and 4 other — 62/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Await Reports Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCD160053292025

Filing Number

84/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

62/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipettai

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vivekanandan rep by Power Agent Narayanasamy

    Adv. S. Gowri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Senthamaraikannan and 4 other

  2. 2.Udhayakumar

  3. 3.Rajeswari

  4. 4.The State of Tamilnadu rep by the District Collector, Cuddalore

  5. 5.The Tahsildhar, Bhuvanagiri

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Await Reports

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Await Reports

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 62/2025 The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Portonovo allowed the petition and granted a temporary injunction. Respondents 1-3 are restrained from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of suit property (1 acre 75 cents at Manjakuzhi Village) or encroaching upon it pending final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury in the petitioner's favor, as respondents failed to provide convincing material to dispute the petitioner's possession claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 62/2025 The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Portonovo allowed the petition and granted a temporary injunction. Respondents 1-3 are restrained from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of suit property (1 acre 75 cents at Manjakuzhi Village) or encroaching upon it pending final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury in the petitioner's favor, as respondents failed to provide convincing material to dispute the petitioner's possession claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case