SHANMUGAM vs RAMALINGAM — 388/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--Acquitted on 14th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCD160019242024
e-Filing Number
26-10-2024
Filing Number
1867/2024
Filing Date
05-Nov-2024
Registration No
388/2024
Registration Date
05-Nov-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipettai
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Acquitted
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANMUGAM
Adv. Beemarao M
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMALINGAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-May-2026
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2026
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2026
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This document is a deposition of witness record, not a court judgment or decision. It records the testimony of PW-1 (P. Shanmugam, age 50) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate in Portonovo on 17.02.2026 under the Oaths Act 1969. The witness's statement concerning e-filed documents and related evidence was recorded in open court, and the case is scheduled for cross-examination. No substantive court decision or ruling is present in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Oct-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jun-2025
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2025
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2025
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2025
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2025
For Discovery / Inspection / Production
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2025
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2025
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jan-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Dec-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 388/2024
This document is a deposition of witness record, not a court judgment or decision. It records the testimony of PW-1 (P. Shanmugam, age 50) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate in Portonovo on 17.02.2026 under the Oaths Act 1969. The witness's statement concerning e-filed documents and related evidence was recorded in open court, and the case is scheduled for cross-examination. No substantive court decision or ruling is present in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts