Gandhi vs Shanmugasundaram Advocate - K. Anandan — 166/2025
Case under Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section GandhiShanmugasundaram. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCD160007322025
e-Filing Number
11-03-2025
Filing Number
716/2025
Filing Date
18-Mar-2025
Registration No
166/2025
Registration Date
18-Mar-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipettai
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gandhi
Adv. K. Anandan Anandan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shanmugasundaram Advocate - K. Anandan
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: STC.166/2025 This is a civil case heard in the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate court in Portonovo on 14.05.2026 under the Oaths Act 1969. The court examined witness D. Yuvaraj (age 45) regarding allegations involving a Rs. 5 lakh monetary transaction between the petitioner Gandhi and respondent Shanmugasundaram Advocate K. Anandan. The witness testimony addressed claims about when money was allegedly given, employment details, property ownership, and documentation related to the disputed transaction. The court recorded the witness statement and cross-examination findings regarding the parties' conflicting accounts of events in October 2024 and December 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-May-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Apr-2025
Sworn Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 166/2025
Case Summary: STC.166/2025 This is a civil case heard in the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate court in Portonovo on 14.05.2026 under the Oaths Act 1969. The court examined witness D. Yuvaraj (age 45) regarding allegations involving a Rs. 5 lakh monetary transaction between the petitioner Gandhi and respondent Shanmugasundaram Advocate K. Anandan. The witness testimony addressed claims about when money was allegedly given, employment details, property ownership, and documentation related to the disputed transaction. The court recorded the witness statement and cross-examination findings regarding the parties' conflicting accounts of events in October 2024 and December 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts