Thanumalaiyaperumal vs Chidambaranathan — 528/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCD150006422023

Filing Number

590/2023

Filing Date

21-Jun-2023

Registration No

528/2023

Registration Date

21-Jun-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Neyveli

Judge

2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Conviction

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thanumalaiyaperumal

    Adv. V.Narayanasamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chidambaranathan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 26-May-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 22-May-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 20-May-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 13-May-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 06-May-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 22-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 17-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 25-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 20-Feb-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 13-Feb-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 12-Feb-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 02-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 19-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 08-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  30. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  31. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  32. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  33. 30-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  34. 17-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  35. 25-Aug-2025

    Cmp Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  36. 12-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  37. 22-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  38. 21-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  39. 07-May-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  40. 22-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  41. 24-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  42. 07-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  43. 26-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  44. 07-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  45. 20-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  46. 16-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  47. 09-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  48. 18-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  49. 04-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  50. 14-Oct-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  51. 25-Sep-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  52. 13-Sep-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  53. 02-Sep-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  54. 20-Aug-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  55. 19-Aug-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  56. 14-Aug-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  57. 02-Aug-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  58. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  59. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  60. 15-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  61. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  62. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  63. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  64. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  65. 21-Jun-2024

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  66. 14-Jun-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case 528/2023 Summary Petitioner Thanumalaiyaperumal's testimony in this civil case (heard 14.06.2024) reveals a lending dispute with respondent Chidambaranathan. The petitioner, a 66-year-old retired NLC employee, testified that he lent ₹6 lakhs to the respondent on 03.03.2023 near a textile shop in Kadalur, and subsequently obtained ₹11 lakhs in mortgage deeds (₹6 lakhs from respondent, ₹5 lakhs from respondent's wife) as security. The petitioner denied that the respondent's wife directly borrowed money from him, clarified his income tax filing did not record the loan, and maintained he had no prior relationship with the respondent before this transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  67. 14-Jun-2024

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  68. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  69. 22-May-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  70. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  71. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  72. 25-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  73. 18-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  74. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  75. 12-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  76. 23-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  77. 08-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  78. 05-Dec-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  79. 05-Dec-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  80. 10-Nov-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  81. 30-Oct-2023

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  82. 11-Oct-2023

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  83. 12-Sep-2023

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  84. 21-Aug-2023

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  85. 02-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  86. 14-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  87. 03-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  88. 21-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 528/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 528/2023 Summary Petitioner Thanumalaiyaperumal's testimony in this civil case (heard 14.06.2024) reveals a lending dispute with respondent Chidambaranathan. The petitioner, a 66-year-old retired NLC employee, testified that he lent ₹6 lakhs to the respondent on 03.03.2023 near a textile shop in Kadalur, and subsequently obtained ₹11 lakhs in mortgage deeds (₹6 lakhs from respondent, ₹5 lakhs from respondent's wife) as security. The petitioner denied that the respondent's wife directly borrowed money from him, clarified his income tax filing did not record the loan, and maintained he had no prior relationship with the respondent before this transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case