Selvaganapathy vs Shanthi and 3 others — 14/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCD140000192022
Filing Number
19/2022
Filing Date
06-Jan-2022
Registration No
14/2022
Registration Date
12-Jan-2022
Court
Sub Court, Neyveli
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Selvaganapathy
Adv. Thiru.A.Moovendan.,B.A.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shanthi and 3 others
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Judgement
Sub Judge
-
15-Jun-2026
Judgement
Sub Judge
-
11-Jun-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
08-Jun-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
01-Jun-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition
Case Summary: OS 14/2022 – Selvaganapathy v. Shanthi and 3 others In this civil suit, the court examined disputes regarding property rights and documentary evidence. The court found that certain documents relied upon by the petitioner were not properly authenticated as genuine court records, and therefore could not be admitted as evidence. The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner failed to establish the legitimacy of the documents and did not adequately prove the claims made in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
22-Oct-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Copy of Deposition
-
08-Oct-2025
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Appearance
Sub Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Appearance
Sub Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Copy of Deposition
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Issues
Sub Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
21-Jun-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
29-Feb-2024
Issues
Sub Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
31-Jan-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
30-Jan-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
18-Jan-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
04-Nov-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
02-Aug-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
08-Jun-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
26-Apr-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
21-Apr-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
13-Apr-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
10-Apr-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
20-Mar-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
16-Feb-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
02-Feb-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
12-Jan-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
13-Dec-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
09-Nov-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
20-Sep-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
22-Aug-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
18-Jul-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
06-Jul-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
01-Jul-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
24-Jun-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
18-Apr-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
05-Apr-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
07-Mar-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
23-Feb-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
12-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 14/2022
Case Summary: OS 14/2022 – Selvaganapathy v. Shanthi and 3 others In this civil suit, the court examined disputes regarding property rights and documentary evidence. The court found that certain documents relied upon by the petitioner were not properly authenticated as genuine court records, and therefore could not be admitted as evidence. The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner failed to establish the legitimacy of the documents and did not adequately prove the claims made in the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts