Seetharaman vs Jayabal — 179/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, 142. Status: Service Pending-Warrant. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Service Pending-Warrant Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCD120007572024

e-Filing Number

27-02-2024

Filing Number

754/2024

Filing Date

19-Mar-2024

Registration No

179/2024

Registration Date

19-Mar-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Chidambaram

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. I

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, 142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Seetharaman

    Adv. Manoharan P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jayabal

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  6. 17-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  7. 25-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  8. 29-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  9. 02-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  11. 21-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  12. 27-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  13. 06-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  14. 16-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  15. 29-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  16. 03-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  17. 13-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  18. 18-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  19. 31-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  20. 10-Dec-2024

    Copy of Deposition

    Summary of Case STC.No.179/2024 The Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Chidambaram recorded the deposition of witness Seetharaman (complainant) on 10.12.2024 in a cheque case against Jayabal. The witness affirmed his statement and submitted five documentary exhibits including bank cheques from Karur Vysya Bank (₹2,80,000) and Indian Bank, legal notices, postal acknowledgment, and a written undertaking dated 10.02.2018. The court admitted the witness testimony as correct in the presence of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 10-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  22. 09-Dec-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  23. 05-Dec-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  24. 05-Nov-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  25. 08-Oct-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  26. 12-Sep-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  27. 08-Aug-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  28. 19-Jul-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  29. 15-Jun-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  30. 23-May-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  31. 22-Apr-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  32. 19-Apr-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I

  33. 19-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 19-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 179/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case STC.No.179/2024 The Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Chidambaram recorded the deposition of witness Seetharaman (complainant) on 10.12.2024 in a cheque case against Jayabal. The witness affirmed his statement and submitted five documentary exhibits including bank cheques from Karur Vysya Bank (₹2,80,000) and Indian Bank, legal notices, postal acknowledgment, and a written undertaking dated 10.02.2018. The court admitted the witness testimony as correct in the presence of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case